tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12657288.post8609336666653320080..comments2024-01-07T06:59:04.212-05:00Comments on The Playgoer: John Doyle vs The Met?Playgoerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02994724588504353485noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12657288.post-43882776244352977552008-03-29T09:43:00.000-04:002008-03-29T09:43:00.000-04:00Sorry, YES. David Savran gave me permission to pub...Sorry, YES. David Savran gave me permission to publish that.<BR/><BR/>I'm not sure of the etiquette myself in how to refer to such a source. I just meant he emailed it to me and it's not published anywhere. Perhaps in such cases I should just say "in an email..."Playgoerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02994724588504353485noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-12657288.post-6395625752220697172008-03-29T00:21:00.000-04:002008-03-29T00:21:00.000-04:00"in a private email . . ."Did Prof. Savran give yo..."in a private email . . ."<BR/>Did Prof. Savran give you permission to post it? You ought to let readers know whether he gave his okay or if you just decided to share. Help spread some good blogging manners.<BR/><BR/>Anyway, Savran is right about how dull and literal the ham-fisted the Peter Grimes was visually. (The music was, in fact, sublime.) But I think he lets Doyle off the hook too easily.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com